760 Johnson St Unit ##1204, Victoria
Courtesy of Royal LePage Coast Capital - Oak Bay
Real Estate Company
NOTE: MLS® property information is provided under copyright© by the Vancouver Island Real Estate Board and Victoria Real Estate Board. The information is from sources deemed reliable, but should not be relied upon without independent verification. This website may only be used by consumers for the purpose of locating and purchasing real estate. By registering on this website I/We consent to the collection, use and disclosure of personal information as described in our privacy policy.
The trademarks MLS®, Multiple Listing Service® and the associated logos are owned by The Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) and identify the quality of services provided by real estate professionals who are members of CREA. Used under license.
Market-statistics note: the map and MLS® results on this page focus on condos in buildings historically associated with short-term-rental use. The six cards currently use the broader Greater Victoria condo market report for context and should not be interpreted as short-term-rental income statistics.
Search current condos in Victoria buildings that were historically associated with vacation-rental, Airbnb and transient-accommodation use, while reviewing the provincial and municipal rules that now sharply restrict that use.
For many years, a small group of Downtown Victoria and Old Town condo buildings occupied a distinct niche in the local market. Their zoning, legal non-conforming status, strata bylaws or development history made them attractive to buyers looking for nightly or vacation-rental flexibility.
That historic status materially affected value. Studios and compact one-bedroom units in buildings such as The Janion, Mermaid Wharf, The Union, The Juliet and The Falls could attract buyers who wanted a downtown pied-à-terre, occasional personal use and the ability to generate short-term accommodation revenue when they were away.
The provincial regulatory changes that took effect in 2024 fundamentally changed that investment thesis. In communities where the principal-residence requirement applies, including Victoria, a unit generally cannot be operated as a non-owner-occupied short-term rental simply because the building historically allowed that use.
Under the provincial Short-Term Rental Accommodations Act, the principal-residence requirement generally limits short-term-rental accommodation in affected communities to the host’s principal residence, plus one qualifying secondary suite or accessory dwelling unit on the same property.
The City of Victoria currently defines a short-term rental as accommodation offered for fewer than 30 nights. A lawful City business licence is required, and the City states that the dwelling must be the operator’s principal dwelling unit.
The provincial changes removed the former legal non-conforming-use protection that had allowed some existing short-term-rental operations to continue after local zoning changes. Historic zoning or past Airbnb use therefore does not by itself preserve a present right to operate.
A strata corporation can impose its own bylaws. A buyer must review the current bylaws and obtain the required strata confirmation where applicable. A building’s reputation as “rental friendly” is not enough.
The current restrictions are provincial policy, not an immutable feature of condominium ownership. During the 2024 provincial election, the B.C. Conservatives under John Rustad campaigned on repealing the provincial rules that restrict short-term rentals to an operator’s principal residence or qualifying secondary unit.
A future Conservative government could therefore revisit, relax or repeal the current framework. That is a genuine political possibility, but it is not current law and should never be priced into a purchase as though reversal were assured.
The Province introduced the restrictions with the stated objective of returning more housing to the long-term market. Whether the policy has materially improved overall housing affordability remains contested. Critics argue that restricting short-term rentals did not address the underlying shortage of new housing supply, while supporters credit the rules with shifting some units toward longer-term occupancy. The Province itself now permits certain communities with sustained rental vacancy rates of at least 3% to seek an opt-out, reflecting that housing and tourism conditions differ by market.
The following buildings were historically marketed, zoned, grandfathered or otherwise commonly associated with short-term vacation-rental use. Some buildings have multiple civic addresses, and historic eligibility could vary by unit, zoning history and strata bylaws. This list is preserved as a market-history reference, not as a statement of present operating permission.
517 Fisgard Street / 528 Pandora Avenue
456 Pandora Avenue / 1610 Store Street
595 Pandora Avenue
599 Pandora Avenue
534 Pandora Avenue / 535 Fisgard Street
524–534 Yates Street
707 Courtney Street / 708 Burdett Avenue
1315 Waddington Alley
760 Johnson Street
1602 Quadra Street
562 Yates Street
409 Swift Street
601 Herald Street
608 Broughton Street
610 Johnson Street
613 Herald Street
788 Humboldt Street
732 Broughton Street (historical reference)
960 Yates Street
728 Yates Street
751 Fairfield Road
732 Cormorant Street
Do not buy a condo on the assumption that a former vacation-rental reputation, an old business licence, historic zoning or a previous owner’s Airbnb use creates a transferable right. Confirm current provincial law, municipal zoning and licensing, the strata bylaws, any developer rental disclosure and the exact use history of the individual strata lot.
Even without unrestricted nightly-rental use, many of these buildings remain highly relevant to condo buyers because they occupy some of Downtown Victoria’s most walkable and distinctive locations. The Janion and Mermaid Wharf sit directly on or beside the Inner Harbour, while The Union, Vogue, Leiser, Oriental and other Old Town buildings offer heritage character and immediate access to restaurants, shops, Chinatown and the waterfront.
Many were designed around compact urban living and historically attracted investors, second-home owners and buyers who valued flexibility. That history can still influence suite sizes, furnishing packages, storage arrangements, parking availability, owner-occupier ratios and the way the building is perceived in the resale market.
The current legislation does not prohibit every short-term rental in Victoria. A qualifying owner or tenant may be able to operate a licensed short-term rental from their principal dwelling, subject to provincial rules, City of Victoria requirements and the strata bylaws. The City currently permits an eligible operator to rent the entire principal residence while temporarily away for a limited number of nights per year, or to rent qualifying bedrooms while at home.
That is materially different from the former investment model in which an owner could acquire a downtown condo primarily or exclusively for nightly accommodation.
The provincial regulations contain exemptions for certain accommodation types, including qualifying strata-titled hotels or motels that operate in a manner similar to a hotel or motel and satisfy the regulatory criteria. Time-share, fractional-ownership and certain other accommodation arrangements can also receive different treatment.
These exemptions are technical. A condo building should never be assumed to qualify merely because it has historically had vacation rentals or because a listing describes it as “hotel-like.”
For buyers considering one of these buildings today, value should be analyzed primarily as ordinary condominium ownership unless a current legal short-term-rental use has been independently confirmed. Compare long-term rent potential, furnished mid-term rental demand where permitted, strata fees, parking, storage, building condition, location, suite size and resale appeal.
The historic STR premium may have changed, but desirable downtown buildings can still command strong value because of waterfront proximity, walkability, concrete construction, heritage character or scarcity.
Properties with a history of commercial short-term accommodation can raise GST and income-tax questions that differ from an ordinary owner-occupied resale condo. Buyers should obtain tax advice before relying on a seller’s historic treatment of the unit, especially where the property was furnished, operated as a business or previously claimed input tax credits.
Review the current strata bylaws, Form B, depreciation report, financial statements, council and AGM minutes, insurance, zoning, business-licence requirements and any available records concerning prior use. If short-term rental flexibility is part of the purchase rationale, obtain confirmation directly from the applicable authorities rather than relying on old MLS remarks or building reputation.
The MLS® listings below include condos drawn from the group of buildings historically associated with short-term or vacation-rental use. Their inclusion here describes the building’s market history; it does not certify current eligibility for unrestricted short-term rental operation.